What method is used to determine priorities in responding scenarios according to EO 1.21?

The method used to determine priorities in responding scenarios according to EO 1.21 is risk assessments that evaluate urgency and potential impact. This approach is essential as it focuses on systematically analyzing incidents to identify which situations pose the greatest threat or require the most immediate attention. By assessing the potential impact of an incident and its urgency, responders can allocate resources more effectively and ensure that critical situations are addressed promptly.

Prioritizing based on risk allows for informed decision-making, ensuring that limited resources are directed toward scenarios that have the highest stakes for public safety, health, or security. This structured approach minimizes the likelihood of negative outcomes and helps maintain effective operational readiness.

Other methods such as public opinion surveys, random selection of incidents, and availability of resources do not provide a comprehensive or objective basis for prioritizing responses. Relying solely on public opinion may lead to biased results that do not reflect the actual severity or urgency of incidents. Random selection lacks the strategic evaluation needed for effective response prioritization, and merely considering resource availability may overlook the critical factors associated with urgency and overall impact on the community.